
by Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira
Perplexity pairs well with soft leather chairs, into which a man sinks with pleasure. There is a certain analogy between being mired in perplexing questions and sitting in soft springy armchairs. Sunk into leather, a perplexed man is bogged down in both body and soul, which gives his situation that unity our nature persistently demands.
True, such unity does not come without some contradiction. Perplexities create a painful quagmire for the mind—purgatory, sometimes even hell. Conversely, the leather and springs offer the weary body a delightful, restorative quagmire. However, this contradiction does not weaken the unity; it alleviates the person’s torment rather than increasing it.
To illustrate this, it would suffice for the reader to imagine how much worse the situation of a perplexed man would be, sitting on a hard wooden bench…
All this came to mind as I remembered that, one evening after dinner, I decided to reflect on the national situation—a quagmire in the most precise and sinister sense of the word. To do this, I instinctively sank into a deep, soft leather armchair and began to think…
A dark, chaotic swirl of national, ideological, social, and economic issues began spinning through my mind. To see clearly, I tried to halt that ugly dance and examine each issue individually. But each seemed to avoid precise scrutiny, performing before my increasingly exhausted eyes a spasmodic motion similar to delirium tremens. I persisted. Yet, no matter how much I tried, they only increased their trembling and suddenly resumed their wild dance.
Fever? A nightmare? The truth is, I suddenly faced a real person, of flesh and blood.
And I—who had planned to share my conclusions with readers—found myself instead just recounting what this character said to me.
